I’ve always believed that as the software progresses, leaving the above applications, we are losing a good part of the work there It has been done because in general commercial software companies not made available to the public the source code for older versions of its programs. It makes sense, for example, that if I have my program in its version 7.0, do not give access to the source code versions 4.0 onwards, because maybe the difference in time is small, perhaps one or two years maximum and in that time generally not sufficiently different versions are generated. But think for instance in Turbo Pascal. As far as I remember, it was precisely in version 7 and then migrate to Windows, first as Turbo Pascal for Windows 1.0 and later as Delphi. Delphi compiler needs to be something more than a traditional Pascal compiler. In fact, you have to take all the particulars of the GUI. Putting open source version 1, 2 or 3.0 Turbo Pascal, maybe it helps a lot of people studying compilers, to understand a fantastic example of how to compile at tremendous speeds, source code written in Pascal.
Perhaps, I believe, be those who think that the Delphi code is very similar in what concerns compilation to Turbo Pascal, but the reality is that today Delphi has a far superior in many respects to the venerable Borland Turbo Pascal compiler and therefore, I think the original code did not donate this takes away something that everyone could learn. Come on, it’s like a renowned author last of which-for some reason his works were lost and not being published because the idea that probably published much but all that material is lost in time only.
But let’s forget the source code. How about putting free software download obsolete? Borland, who later became CodeGear and Embarcadero eventually, put some versions of Turbo Pascal for free. I think it was the most advanced 5.5 I can not remember. I do not know what response have had and how many times you have downloaded these programs at the time were great for learning to program a turbo speed. I just think that for financial or economic issues, because ultimately the development costs and give it to others to some may seem to be giving the job (and can be), many of the great programming efforts end up missing.
Therefore, it is noteworthy that Adobe has decided to put a good part of his graphic suite (CS2) Adobe Photoshop, Premiere Pro, Illustrator, InDesign, and more, for free. And no, there is no trick behind. All he asks is that whoever Adobes all those versions open an account on your site . Come on, you have to resgistrarse and ready. Versions run on Mac and Windows and as far as I understand, Adobe does not plan to support those older versions. Wear all at your own risk which, if we are honest, is very low, considering the quality that has always delivered Adobe to their customers.
The CS2 is not the most modern of Photoshop, for example, but has a very good image processing power that can serve most eventually use graphic design programs. In fact, Photoshop has a number of features that probably most potential users do not even know they exist. Obviously there could be incompatibilities of this system with new versions of platforms such as OS X or Windows, but is ultimately a matter of taste.
There is however a say version, it comes from an engineer at Adobe, Dov Isaacs, which clarifies that it is false that the CS2 products have been released for use for free. According to this version, which seems to be happening it is that you are going out and activation servers for that version, so Adobe is offering copies with special keys that do not require activation of the customers who bought those products. I’m not sure it’s version is true, because how many servers required for activation scheme? It sounds a difficult argument to believe.
But perhaps you have to do is to test and see if you can download these versions CS2. That could end these rumors or alternate versions and thus know what is happening in Adobe
References:.
Gizmodo
Adobe
No comments:
Post a Comment