the OAS will be the evaluation of electoral program, we ask them to inform us
INDRA Software system before 15 to advise some guidelines,
as OAS is not infallible and have had problems with them in 1965, in 1978 and the Haitian case.
I think, validating results against acts of parties, that data sent and joined in JCE, is what we are not told how they will do with the Spanish program INDRA Corp.
I suggest the JCE that are allowed in 80% of schools do both counts, manual and automated to check that the results are the same. Scanner connections and always give problems.
Hackers are another problem, use the source code, or source code to alter in an instant
transmission data to load, so JCE should establish a certain order of
load of results based on the results of previous elections, so that
Sunday night, May 15, 2016, does not appear, for example, the Government is the wide
winner and then with the passing of the hours on Monday, the result is bailing go, what
undermines the credibility of the results.
who he has engaged in electoral processes:
1) Kadafi and took almost 70% in all elections;
2) Angola, where he was charged with fraud by the national electoral commission? . beyond
3) Nicaragua protests and 4 dead Ortega won with 60%;
4) Ecuador where Correa was consecrated in two elections (56.65%, and
5) Bolivia Evo Morales is credited with 64.22%.
6) in Spain, the country of origin, there was a big fuss about the numerous errors produced by Indra in the electronic consultation on the reform of the Diagonal.
what did not prevent the Spanish multinational weeks after the scrutiny of the Catalan regional elections adjudicase, giving a win to CiU (38.47%) but with an abstention rate of 40.05% of voters.
Cristina Kirchner also used the services of INDRA for the 2011 elections and won 54%.
Several newspapers are asking ” why this magic number is always displayed?
I say it’s the number that Danilo won in 2016.
in 2011, Cristina Kirchner won the election handily. But it is true that there was fraud.
That 54% famous is a lie. The existence of ballot boxes and telegrams in which he won 100% of the votes, is an irrefutable indicator of fraud.
Indra was responsible for the provisional scrutiny of elections there, in 1997 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009 and 2011.
the source code is input to the system from any terminal that allows manipulation from anywhere on the planet, as well as “hackers” involved on websites of large companies, it is not necessary even to the rectors of the JCE know this, they with “audits” that claim to be reinforced and demos presented, I am convinced that the system is perfect.
but only it advertised what reaches the center totalizations.
they say in Argentina that INDRA is a very serious business, but are puppets of the ruling and power and are not the instigators, fraud, although they are sinners by default.
is it normal INDRA is winning all tenders since 1995 to date in the Hispanic world?
He trusted in the JCE and I hope we’re invited as an observer.
No comments:
Post a Comment