Rawpixel – Shutterstock
Some of us dedicate ourselves to examining the benefits of free software versus proprietary are, and Why do we prefer this. Nothing we say, however, implies that programs with private license have to be bad, quite the contrary, but the development of free technology favors the progress with your own accessible and shared dynamic .
However, I believe that not only set this idea and even constatarla: the way we suggest someone not very aware of how this technology works using program free software I also think it is important.
A superficial idea of free software
Ra2studio – Shutterstock
When a person stands at the user level with new technologies comes first the use of open source software, used to manage proprietary software, often do thinking about finding an alternative this, perhaps free or affordable . It is very likely already used before free software without being aware of it, but when knowing interested in the concept and look, your desire is usually substitute : used proprietary software web design, publishing layout, treatment Many come with free software seeking alternatives to digital proprietary programs
image, picture or video editing, etc. and now need other, as professional as those has been applied but did not get out of your budget or help you save. And a friend recommends some free software: because this program is as proprietary but free or much cheaper. . And so all
It is possible that, well, do not seem to be a bad way to start with free software; perhaps, if it were not for this, never come to know one bit as such and better so any way. Certainly, but perspective that is offered to the general public free software , though inaccurate, is like, and I think no other possibility really encourage adherence to this dynamic . technology and their development
The best promotion of free software
Bplanet – Shutterstock
Some people think it’s best to save words and efforts in explanations and go so easy to make people understand what is free software; and still others have stated why the engine of this technology is replacing probably confusing inaccurate advertising that circulates around with what is normal movement, and nothing further from the reality logically free software, by its nature already described and except some areas, usually go ahead in its development. But this It would better promote free software as an independent technological development
circumstances and much of it not unique technology are little known among mainstream users.
Being well, I sincerely believe that the best we could promote among the general public is the focus of free software matured in its own ecosystem, with ideas and not with the technological replacement as the effort to achieve their best, most innovative, practical and functional, unimpeded access, which not only meets needs that have already covered the proprietary software but especially those that do not.
It is undeniable that some have entertained draw almost free copies privately licensed programs very well known, and although this was the most widespread tendency-and I think that simply walk through any repository of free software to check what it is not, I think that both current and dissemination should follow the independent approach I described and not a few mates defend. Because in the end, helps what matters : that we have a technology, has the license you have, able to meet the expectations of all , to suit the taste of each person and meet the challenges that arise and meet the social demands that are always ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment